Mergers, Acquisitions & Team Take Outs In Recruiting

Carol Metzner • January 11, 2022

During 2021, growth through mergers and acquisitions (M&A) continued to be a stronghold within the North American architectural and engineering consulting marketplace. Rusk O'Brien Gido & Partners reported that 2021 was a record-breaking year for A/E M&A activity. Professional services firms competing for talent have figured out that to grow in new regions or new disciplines, M&A or recruiting through full team take-outs is a viable option.


Traditionally, firms identify, recruit and hire practice builders or leaders in a specific market sector or location. These strategic hires are then tasked to build a team. While this practice still exists, many firms are targeting specific firms or leaders with cohesive teams to shorten the timeline for growth. These teams are enticed to move together for a new opportunity. It is a win for the team and a win for the hiring company! There is an old saying "People leave managers, not companies." While that can be true, it is also a fact that people leave companies to stay with their managers.


While firms have tried to thwart efforts of teams leaving by demanding leaders sign non-compete and/or non-solicit contracts, they are finding that staff and the courts are frowning on such agreements. The U.S. Department of Justice's promise to criminally prosecute “no-poach” agreements, have left employers questioning how to protect their employees and teams from being "poached" or recruited by competitors. For clarity, a no-poach agreement is an agreement between two or more employers not to hire employees away from each other. 


Recruiting in the A/E marketplace for 30+ years, I have seen recruiting trends come and go. M&A and team take-outs are only going to increase as the market for talent tightens. A client recently asked me what ideas I could offer to keep talented staff and teams from leaving. The answers are many and varied. At the top of the list is reviewing company culture, something that is incredibly difficult to change. Exciting projects, compensation and great colleagues are great places to start...but lately staff and their teams won't accept a company culture that views them as widgets.

The Metzner Group Blog

When "The Client is Always Right" Isn't Always Right: Navigating Tough Decisions as an Executive Recruiter

By Carol Metzner • October 22, 2025
Last night, I had an unsettling phone call with a client. It pushed me to assess whether "the client is always right." Here is what I came up with: In executive recruitment, "the client is always right" is a guiding principle. After all, clients trust us to understand their needs, align with their vision, and deliver top-tier talent. But what happens when that principle collides with another: the duty to place candidates into environments where they can thrive? Every recruiter has that moment of realization—a client may seek a professional, but their leadership style, company culture, or expectations send up red flags. Perhaps their demands are unrealistic, or their treatment of candidates raises ethical concerns. These situations challenge recruiters to balance two critical priorities: maintaining client relationships and protecting candidates from potentially detrimental placements. As recruiters, we’re not just matchmakers but stewards of careers and livelihoods. Candidates trust us to help them take the next step in their professional journey. If a client demonstrates behaviors or values that could lead to a toxic environment, we must assess and address the situation with integrity. This doesn’t mean severing ties with challenging clients immediately. Open communication is key—have a candid conversation to understand their expectations and share your observations. Sometimes, clients are unaware of how their actions or words come across and are willing to adjust. However, if it becomes clear that their approach contradicts your commitment to ethical placements, it may be time to reconsider the partnership. Ultimately, I have decided that "the client is always right" has its limits. As an executive recruiter, my reputation hinges on filling roles and making placements that benefit both sides. Walking away from a mismatched client might feel like a loss in the short term, but in the long run, it reinforces my integrity and ensures the candidates I work with continue to see me as an ally in their careers. After all, my genuine client is the principle of finding the right fit—for everyone involved. What are your thoughts? #civilengineeringexecutivesearch #architectureexecutivesearch #executivesearch #AEP #ethics #recruiterinsights

Strategic Career Choices: Beyond the Bottom Line

By Carol Metzner • October 22, 2025
Many of us understand the significance of both short-term gains and long-term investments. When evaluating a new opportunity, the financial package plays a critical role—it reflects the value of your expertise and supports your aspirations, both today and in the future. However, compensation should not be the only compass. A truly strategic decision considers how the role aligns with your vision, challenges your abilities, and fuels your capacity to lead with impact. The right opportunity integrates financial reward with culture and mission that drive fulfillment, growth, and purpose. One should not accept an offer solely based on money, nor should one reject an offer solely because of financial reasons. Leadership is about balancing head and heart, value and vision. Let’s prioritize decisions that secure not just wealth but meaning. What principles guide your career decisions? #Architecture #CivilEngineering #ExecutiveSearch #Recruiter #AE #RecruiterInsights